Thanks. I don't disagree, I was just interested in your
perspective. I also think OpenMap is great, and would be greater
with documentation that helped people get up to speed faster. I
don't know what metric is current, but it used to be that if people
couldn't figure out how to get started in the first 15 minutes, or 10
minutes, or 5 (I'm sure the time is decreasing as everyone has less
time), they would just drop it. So I'm wondering what list of 10-
minute tutorials would be helpful to people with specific goals but
little OpenMap experience.
As for UML, I have some fancy UML tools I'll apply to OpenMap to see
what comes out.
Geoffrey
-- Geoffrey S. Knauth | http://knauth.org/gsk On Mar 21, 2006, at 07:03, Geir Øvsttun (AS/ETO) wrote: > Keep in mind I am not a hard-core "hacker" just a guy who needs to > develop tools to be used within my domain. > I find the docs sketchy, too many times I have had to investigate > source to find out what is really going on > and the docs lacks a good focused set of examples on how to use the > various classes. > A UML based overview of the whole class hierarchy would also be > great (which was a great help when i was using MapObjects) > > I guess others will disagree..... > > But me and OpenMap live happily with these shortcoming :-) -- [To unsubscribe to this list send an email to "majdart@bbn.com" with the following text in the BODY of the message "unsubscribe openmap-users"]Received on Tue Mar 21 07:49:19 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 21 2006 - 07:49:20 EST