Re: [fwd] Draft charters for work on Semantics for WS]

From: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
Date: Wed Mar 15 2006 - 18:17:25 EST

> [David Martin]
> Another item of interest - W3C is currently having an internal review of
> the 2 SWS activity proposals. These are the same proposed activities
> that Carine put forward for comment back in Nov. (see below). The
> current versions of the proposed charters are here:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/sa-ws-charter
> http://www.w3.org/2005/09/sws-ig-charter
>
> Some additional background here:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/01/ws-activity
>
> If anyone has any thoughts/opinions/concerns about these I'm very
> interested to hear them (and I will consider reflecting them in the
> internal discussion).

Well, I'm in favor of the public-swsig mailing list continuing (or
whatever the name is exactly). Is that the sort of thing you're
looking for? I checked the sws-ig-charter document, and it says there
are no deliverables for this group. Is the review just a routine
culling of inactive groups?

                                             -- Drew

--
[To unsubscribe to this list send an email to "majdart@bbn.com"
with the following text in the BODY of the message "unsubscribe daml-process"]
Received on Wed Mar 15 18:23:46 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 15 2006 - 18:23:47 EST