Re: [OpenMap Users] OpenMap Debug vs Log4J

Hi Piotr,

The main reason I like the idea of the Java Logging API is that it's
built into the jdk. It does have the jdk 1.4 requirement, though,
which OpenMap doesn't have (yet). I've heard many good things about
log4j, too. We haven't really looked at the alternatives yet but
thanks for the input, it matters and helps.

Debug won't be changing for 4.6, though, we're going to make it a final
release sometime next week. We're in the process of wrapping in some
contributions (yours included) and last-minute API changes (projection
factory, maybe some localization framework if possible).

- Don

On Nov 2, 2003, at 6:23 PM, pitek wrote:

> Hi Don,
> You wrote in one of your letters about using Java 1.4 Logging API
> instead of Debug class. I think Debug class could be changed
> for something else, but I'm not sure if Java Logging API is the
> best one to use. In my project I'm going to use Log4Java.
> I thought about using standard API but Log4J seems more
> interesting to me especially after reading this article:
> http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Log4JProjectPages/
> Log4jvsJDKLogging
> So, are you going to change Debug to something else in 4.6 release?
> Regards,
> Piotr Kaminski

--
[To unsubscribe to this list send an email to "majdart@bbn.com"
with the following text in the BODY of the message "unsubscribe openmap-users"]